Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-09 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Aurora and Stellar Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimesnity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is much better than OPPO Reno6 5G, having a overall score of 85.5 against 73.9. Despite of the fact the Galaxy A51 is older and just a bit thicker than OPPO Reno6 5G, it's construction is still a little lighter. These devices work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should provide you identical operating system features.
The OPPO Reno6 5G counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. OPPO Reno6 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Reno6 5G also counts with a just a little greater pixel number in each display inch.
Galaxy A51 features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno6 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A51 also has an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The OPPO Reno6 5G counts with a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a slightly better camera than OPPO Reno6 5G, although it has a way less mega-pixels camera, a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos and a worse video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.