Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-09 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora and Stellar Black | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimesnity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is a lot better than the OPPO Reno6 5G's global score of 73.9. Although it's the best device in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy A52 body is just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier than OPPO Reno6 5G. OPPO Reno6 5G counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno6 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the OPPO Reno6 5G also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy A52 features much more storage capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno6 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than OPPO Reno6 5G, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a 64 mega-pixels camera. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a little longer battery life than OPPO Reno6 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.