Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-09-09 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora and Stellar Black | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimesnity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is a lot better than the OPPO Reno6 5G's 73.9 global score. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and OPPO Reno6 5G has Android 11, giving you a couple additional features. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's construction is a bit heavier and just a little thicker than OPPO Reno6 5G.
The OPPO Reno6 5G counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The OPPO Reno6 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Reno6 5G also counts with a bit higher amount of pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a slightly better camera than OPPO Reno6 5G, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos, they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition. The Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno6 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 5G has just a little better battery performance than OPPO Reno6 5G, because it has a 5% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.