Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-09 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora and Stellar Black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimesnity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is a lot better than OPPO Reno6 5G's 73.9 score. Even though the Galaxy A52s is a better phone than OPPO Reno6 5G, it must be told that it's also a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. Both phones in our current comparison use the same Android 11 OS.
OPPO Reno6 5G has just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the OPPO Reno6 5G also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. OPPO Reno6 5G has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno6 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52s takes a bit better pictures and videos than OPPO Reno6 5G, although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography, they both have the same video definition, a same resolution back camera and the same video frame rate.
Galaxy A52s counts with a little better battery performance than OPPO Reno6 5G, because it has a 5 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.