Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-09 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora and Stellar Black | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimesnity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a score of 76.9, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno6 5G's 73.9 global score. Despite being the best we are comparing, we must tell that it is also older, just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A70 has an older 10 version and OPPO Reno6 5G has Android 11.
The OPPO Reno6 5G features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Reno6 5G also counts with a little more pixels per display inch. The Galaxy A70 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno6 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A70 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
OPPO Reno6 5G counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Reno6 5G counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A70. Both have the same (4K) video definition, a F1.7 aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy A70 features just a little better battery life than OPPO Reno6 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.