Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-09 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora and Stellar Black | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimesnity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is better than the OPPO Reno6 5G, getting an 85.2 score against 73.9. Although it's the best device in this review, we must note that it is also an a lot older, just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker device. OPPO Reno6 5G counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little bit greater quantity of pixels per display inch, a bit larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno6 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The OPPO Reno6 5G has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno6 5G has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 13 percent more battery size. OPPO Reno6 5G captures clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has a camera in the back with a much higher 64 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.