Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-09 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Aurora and Stellar Black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimesnity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is much better than OPPO Reno6 5G, with a 97.6 score against 73.9. Galaxy Fold's construction is a little bit thinner than OPPO Reno6 5G, but it's extremely heavier and was released many years before. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Reno6 5G has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Reno6 5G has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better display density. The Galaxy Fold features a bit better processor than OPPO Reno6 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM.
OPPO Reno6 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or video in low-light situations and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno6 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
Galaxy Fold counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno6 5G, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with just a little better battery performance than OPPO Reno6 5G, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.