Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-09-09 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora and Stellar Black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimesnity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno6 5G, with a score of 81.2 against 73.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 design is a little bit lighter than the OPPO Reno6 5G, but it is a little bit thicker and was released 8 years before. Both phones in this comparison come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version and OPPO Reno6 5G has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Reno6 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a little sharper display than OPPO Reno6 5G, although it has a just a little lower number of pixels per inch of display, a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080.
The OPPO Reno6 5G features a bit bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno6 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has a way better 64 MP resolution camera in the back and a way bigger aperture.
The OPPO Reno6 5G counts with greater battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.