Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-09 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora and Stellar Black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimesnity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a score of 80.4, which is just a bit better than OPPO Reno6 5G's 73.9 overall score. Galaxy Note Fan Edition's construction is a bit lighter than OPPO Reno6 5G, but it is just a bit thicker and was released 4 years before. OPPO Reno6 5G features a little bit better screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little lower number of pixels per inch in the screen and a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
OPPO Reno6 5G counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has more RAM. OPPO Reno6 5G shoots better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same video quality, a F1.7 aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has a lot more MP back camera.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a slightly bigger storage to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno6 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. OPPO Reno6 5G has improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.