Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-09 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Aurora and Stellar Black | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimesnity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note7 is a little bit better than OPPO Reno6 5G, getting a 79.5 score against 73.9. Galaxy Note7 is a way older and just a bit thicker cellphone than OPPO Reno6 5G, but Samsung was able to build it just a little bit lighter anyway. The OPPO Reno6 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy Note7, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and also faster).
OPPO Reno6 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little inferior pixel amount per display inch, it also counts with a quite larger screen. OPPO Reno6 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has a back-facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy Note7 has a slightly better storage to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno6 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The OPPO Reno6 5G features superior battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.