Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-09 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Aurora and Stellar Black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimesnity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is much better than OPPO Reno6 5G's 73.9 score. Both devices in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while OPPO Reno6 5G has Android 11 version, counting with lots of additional features and some performance improvements. Although it's the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier phone than OPPO Reno6 5G.
The OPPO Reno6 5G counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a bit worse pixels density, a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit smaller screen. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno6 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno6 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with greater battery performance than OPPO Reno6 5G, because it has a 16% larger battery size.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much better videos and photos than OPPO Reno6 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a lot higher video quality and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.