Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-09 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora and Stellar Black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimesnity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active is slightly better than the OPPO Reno6 5G, having a 75.8 score against 73.9. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, Galaxy S7 Active's design is older, just a bit heavier and extremely thicker than the OPPO Reno6 5G. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a slightly better looking screen than OPPO Reno6 5G, because although it has a lot darker display and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and more pixels per inch of display.
OPPO Reno6 5G counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno6 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more RAM and 4 more CPU cores.
OPPO Reno6 5G takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a F1.7 camera aperture, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has a back camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution. The OPPO Reno6 5G has just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.