Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-09 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Aurora and Stellar Black | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimesnity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has an overall score of 81.9, which is better than OPPO Reno6 5G's score of 73.9. Although the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is better than OPPO Reno6 5G, we must highlight that it's also a lot older, heavier and way thicker. The OPPO Reno6 5G features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a little sharper screen than OPPO Reno6 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution. Galaxy S8 Active features a little bit better storage capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno6 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 256 GB.
The OPPO Reno6 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same video quality, the same video frame rates and the same aperture, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has a much higher resolution camera. OPPO Reno6 5G features just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 4300mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.