Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-09 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora and Stellar Black | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimesnity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is a bit better than the OPPO Reno6 5G's general score of 73.9. These phones include the same Android 11 operating system. Galaxy XCover Pro is an older, noticeably thicker and heavier cellphone than the OPPO Reno6 5G. OPPO Reno6 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Reno6 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a quite larger screen and a little greater screen pixel density. OPPO Reno6 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the OPPO Reno6 5G also has a way higher video quality and a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno6 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. OPPO Reno6 5G counts with just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.