Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-09 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Aurora and Stellar Black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimesnity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than OPPO Reno6 5G, getting a 94.6 score against 73.9. Both of these devices use the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is older and incredibly heavier than the OPPO Reno6 5G, it's construction is still a little thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit superior processor than OPPO Reno6 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM.
OPPO Reno6 5G features just a bit better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games than OPPO Reno6 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little better battery duration than OPPO Reno6 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4300mAh. OPPO Reno6 5G takes clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno6 5G also counts with a way better resolution back facing camera and a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.