Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-09 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Aurora and Stellar Black | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimesnity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than OPPO Reno6 5G, getting a score of 90.6 against 73.9. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 3 and OPPO Reno6 5G were only released 1 months apart, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is incredibly heavier but somewhat thinner than OPPO Reno6 5G. Both phones in our current comparison include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little faster processor than OPPO Reno6 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Reno6 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a just a little better screen pixels density.
The OPPO Reno6 5G takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot more mega pixels camera and a way larger camera aperture for better low-light photography and videos. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno6 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a little bit longer battery performance than OPPO Reno6 5G, because it has a 2 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.