Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's global score of 77. IPhone X's construction has the same thickness than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, but it is just a little lighter. IPhone X counts with a little sharper display than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has much lower brightness and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixel quantity per inch of display and a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436.
The iPhone X counts with a bit faster processor than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has an inferior number of slower cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G and the iPhone X feature very similar memory capacity to store more apps and games, they have the same internal memory capacity.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a much better camera than iPhone X, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light images.
The iPhone X features a much better battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.