Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a global score of 84.2, which is a bit better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's score of 77. The iPhone XS body has the same thickness and weight than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The Apple iPhone XS features a little bit better looking display than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has way less brightness and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little bit better screen density.
The iPhone XS counts with a bit faster processor than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has 8 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a superior camera than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a bigger aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited environments and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a much better storage for apps and games than iPhone XS, because it has more internal memory. IPhone XS counts with a much better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.