Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is slightly better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, getting a overall score of 80.2 against 77. Google Pixel is a somewhat lighter but thicker cellphone than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a bit better looking display than Google Pixel, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a larger screen.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel, because it has more internal memory. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a more powerful processor than Google Pixel, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. Google Pixel features a really longer battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G takes better photos and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a larger aperture for better low-light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.