Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is a little bit better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, getting a general score of 82.5 against 77. The Google Pixel 2 XL body is just a little bit lighter but a little bit thicker than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a little worse screen density and a much lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has more internal storage. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a much better battery life than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.