Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, getting an 80 score against 77. Google Pixel 3 is a a little bit thicker but lighter phone than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a little lower screen density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a superior battery life than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a bigger aperture for better images in low-light situations and a much better 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.