Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is slightly better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, having a global score of 78.8 against 77. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. Google Pixel 3a's construction is a bit thicker but lighter than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a just a little inferior count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a little bit better performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Google Pixel 3a counts with a superior battery lifetime than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a lot more MP back camera and a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.