Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, getting an 81.9 score against 77. The Google Pixel 4 design is just a little bit thicker but a bit lighter than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a little bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little bit better performance than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same video frame rate and a same size aperture, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera. Google Pixel 4 features a superior battery lifetime than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.