Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's 77 overall score. Google Pixel 4a 5G's construction is a little lighter but just a little bit thicker than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both of them should give you identical OS features.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a much higher resolution back camera.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a much better battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.