Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| -- | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is just a bit better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, having a score of 77.7 against 77. HTC One M9's construction is noticeably thicker but somewhat lighter than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but the HTC One M9 has the previous 5.0 version while OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11.
The HTC One M9 features a bit faster processor than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64-bits processing unit. The HTC One M9 has a bit sharper screen than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen pixels density.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a back facing camera with lot more MP and a lot larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images.
HTC One M9 features a way better battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.