Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U11 has a general score of 77.6, which is slightly better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's 77 score. The HTC U11 is a a little bit thicker but just a little bit lighter phone than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than HTC U11, because although it has a little lower pixels density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a larger display.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little better performance than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The HTC U11 has a way better battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a superior camera than HTC U11, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.