Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is slightly better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, getting an 82.7 score against 77. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the LG G8X ThinQ has 10 version while OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11 version. Even being the best in this comparison, the LG G8X ThinQ is a just a bit thicker and a little heavier cellphone than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little better performance than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a little bit better display than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a just a little better amount of pixels per inch in the display, a bit bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
LG G8X ThinQ features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a lot better resolution camera and a larger camera aperture to take better low light photos and videos.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a superior battery lifetime than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.