Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is a bit better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's overall score of 77. These phones use Android OS, but the LG V30S ThinQ has newer 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11 version, providing the user a couple additional features and increased performance. LG V30S ThinQ's design is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a much lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a just a bit worse pixels amount in each inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The LG V30S ThinQ has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a bit faster processor than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. LG V30S ThinQ has a much longer battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G shoots better photographs and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.