Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, with an 81.3 score against 77. The LG V35 ThinQ is a somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner cellphone than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The LG V35 ThinQ and OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G count with quite similar displays, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a better pixels count in each inch of screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ features more memory capacity for applications and games than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit better processor than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a way better battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.