Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a global score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's 77 general score. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but the LG V40 ThinQ has older 10 version while OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11. LG V40 ThinQ's design has the same thickness than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, but it is a bit lighter.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit better performance than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G and LG V40 ThinQ both count with incredibly similar displays, because although the LG V40 ThinQ has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ features a superior battery lifetime than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a superior camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.