Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's overall score of 77. The Galaxy A50 is a just a bit lighter phone than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, but they are 0.3inches thick. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A50, because it has a little bit larger screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit higher pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better memory capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has 8 GB more RAM.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a superior camera than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a way higher (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with a way better 64 MP resolution. Galaxy A50 features a superior battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.