Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's global score of 77. Galaxy A51's body is a little bit thicker but a little lighter than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. These phones include the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a bit better processor than Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy A51. They have a display with the same size, the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy A51 has just a bit better camera than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality, a lot lower resolution camera and a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photography. The Galaxy A51 features a little bit more storage to install games and applications than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a superior battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.