Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Prism cube black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, with a 90.8 score against 77. Even being the best we compare here, Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's construction is a bit heavier and thicker than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Both phones in this comparison review have the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G. They have the same quantity of pixels per inch of display, the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a display with the same size. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A51 5G captures a little bit better photos and videos than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition, a much less mega pixels resolution camera and a tinier aperture. The Galaxy A51 5G has a better memory to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A51 5G has a superior battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.