Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is much better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, having a 90.7 score against 77. Galaxy A52's design is a little bit thicker and just a little heavier than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A52. Both of them have the same screen density, a screen with the same size and the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 has a very superior battery lifetime than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Galaxy A52 takes just a bit better videos and photos than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light captures and video, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same resolution camera in the back and the same video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.