Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Prism bricks black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is way better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's 77 general score. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version while OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11 version. Even being the best in this review, the Galaxy A71 5G UW construction is just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a bit greater screen density. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a slightly better camera than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting images in low-light environments, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a 64 mega pixels resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a greater storage for games and applications than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a really longer battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.