Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) is slightly better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, having a general score of 79.2 against 77. The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) body is a little thicker but just a little bit lighter than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a quite lower screen density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger screen.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a way better camera than Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have the same aperture, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a way higher resolution back facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) features a very superior battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.