Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a score of 85.2, which is better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's 77 score. The Galaxy A9 (2018) is a just a bit thicker and a little heavier phone than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a bit bigger screen and a little greater quantity of pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a little bit better storage capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G captures just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, a F1.7 aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a superior battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.