Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| -- | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is way better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, with a 97.6 score against 77. Galaxy Fold's design is a bit thinner but notably heavier than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel count in each inch of display. Galaxy Fold features a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Fold. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much longer battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G takes better videos and photos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.