Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is much better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's overall score of 77. Although it's the best device in this comparison review, Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a somewhat heavier and just a little thicker device than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11, so it offers some extra features and a performance increase.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's processing unit is just as good as OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's processor, both have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a bit smaller display, a quite inferior count of pixels per display inch and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a really longer battery life than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures better photos and videos than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photos and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.