Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 is a bit better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, getting a 79.3 score against 77. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version and OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11. The Galaxy Note 5 is a a bit lighter phone than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, but they are equally thin.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of faster cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a little sharper display than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater screen density.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited situations and a back camera with a way higher 64 MP resolution.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note 5 features a superior battery life than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.