Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a general score of 80.4, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's overall score of 77. Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a just a little thicker but just a little lighter phone than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features just a little better processing power than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has more RAM.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little lower quantity of pixels per inch of display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a quite bigger screen. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a superior battery lifetime than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a much better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a much higher 64 MP resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.