Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, getting a general score of 89 against 77. Galaxy Note10's construction is a little bit lighter but just a little thicker than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a bit bigger screen, a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit higher amount of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G and the Galaxy Note10 have quite similar storage capacity to store more games and applications, both have the same 256 GB internal storage. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note10 counts with a much better battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and video and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.