Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, with a global score of 79.5 against 77. The Galaxy Note7 is a a little thicker but just a little bit lighter phone than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a quite better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bigger display. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same aperture, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera. Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a superior battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.