Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is a lot better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, with a 93.6 score against 77. Galaxy S10 5G is a somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker phone than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a bit smaller display, a quite inferior pixels quantity in each screen inch and a much lower 1080 x 2400 resolution. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a bit better processor than Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP. Galaxy S10 5G features as much storage for apps and games as the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, they have equal internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S10 5G features a really longer battery life than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.