Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is way better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's 77 overall score. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version and OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11 version, providing you some nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a heavier and thicker cellphone than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a quite smaller screen, a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit lower pixel density.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a camera with a much better 108 megapixels resolution and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with more memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.