Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| -- | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, with a 95.4 score against 77. Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is thicker and notably heavier than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11, providing lots of additional features.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a sharper display than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because it has a little bigger screen, a much brighter screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a bit better pixel density.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much clearer pictures and videos than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light captures, it also counts with a much better resolution camera in the back and a way better video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.