Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.24 ounces | -- |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is a bit better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, getting an 82.6 score against 77. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 has the newer 14 version and OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11, so it provides a couple additional features. The Galaxy S25 is a much thinner and lighter device than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy S25, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy S25 has a much better screen than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display and much more display brightness.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy S25 counts with a slightly better camera than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a lot worse 50 MP resolution camera and a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much higher video quality.
Galaxy S25 features a way better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.