Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| -- | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Red |
| Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a score of 77.8, which is slightly better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's 77 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport design is lighter but somewhat thicker than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has the newer 4.4.2 version and OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11, giving you some additional features and better performance.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a little faster CPU than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and more RAM memory. Galaxy S5 Sport features just a bit better display than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display and a quite lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a much larger aperture to take better low-light photos and a much better 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a way better battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.