Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Gold and Gray |
| Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a general score of 81.9, which is slightly better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's 77 global score. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active's body is a lot thicker and heavier than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a bit more vivid screen than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a same size camera aperture, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a back camera with a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S8 Active counts with a very superior battery lifetime than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.