Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, with a general score of 83.3 against 77. The Galaxy S9 body is a little bit thicker but a little bit lighter than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S9 has a slightly better screen than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and more pixels per display inch. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G takes better videos and photos than Galaxy S9, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S9 has a superior battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.